The Globalists' Swiss Army Knife for
Destabilization
"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it
will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."
-- James Madison --
U.S. Backed Terror,
Inc.
The U.S. has a deep history in dealing with terror organizations. Joe Biggs
breaks down the connections between the US and terror organizations like I.S.I.S.
Obama's ISIS Bombing Hoax
Exposed
Published on Aug 9, 2014
President Barack Obama’s authorization of air strikes on ISIS targets in Iraq serves as an opportunity
to remind ourselves which countries are bankrolling the deadly terror group.
… the US will deliver the first of 36 F-16 fighter jets to Iraq in what Baghdad’s envoy to the
United States called a “new chapter” in his country’s ability to defend its vast borders with Iran and
other neighbors.
….the US earlier in March provided Iraq with some 100 Hellfire missiles as well as
assault rifles and other ammunition. Then in April the US sent more arms, providing Iraq with 11 million rounds
of ammunition and other supplies.
It is unknown how many of these have fallen into Al Qaeda/ISIS hands (we do know that at least one
Iraqi Black Hawk chopper was captured during the rush for Mosul). What is known is that as PBS Frontline
reported two weeks ago, while the administration has denied arming Syrian “rebels”, i.e. the same ISIS militants
that have crossed the border and are now fighting in Iraq…
… the Syrian rebels themselves say they are already armed and trained by US in the use of
sophisticated weapons and fighting techniques, including, one rebel said, “how to finish off soldiers still
alive after an ambush.” The interviews are the latest evidence that after more than three
years of warfare, the United States has stepped up the provision of lethal aid to the rebels, as PBS notes
“it appears the Obama administration is allowing select groups of rebels to receive US-made
anti-tank missiles.”
The commander of the unit also told Ali that their American contacts had asked him to bring 80
to 90 members of his unit to Ankara for training.
One of the fighters said they received three weeks of training in how to conduct
ambushes, conduct raids and use their weapons. They also said they received new uniforms and
boots.
“They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut off the road,” said the fighter,
who is identified only as “Hussein.” “They also trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve
information or weapons and munitions, and how to finish off soldiers still alive after an ambush.”
To summarize: the US was arming and training the same Al Qaeda/ISIS groups of Jihadists, that it
concurrently gave Iraq weapons to fight. And since the Iraq army has so far proven utterly incapable of any
resistance, it is now up to US drones to “fight” the same “rebels” that the US itself was collaborating
with until a month or so ago.
The clear winner here? The US military-industrial complex, of course, as well as the banks who lend
money to the governments to fight wars provoked by various “developed nation” spy agencies.
Collateral damage? Millions of innocent people on the ground in Syria and Iraq, and everywhere else
too.
The Truth About ISIS With Syrian Girl
Published on Jul 9, 2014
Who is backing ISIS? What is the agenda behind the group's takeover of Iraq and the Middle East?
U.S. Ambassador Stevens' Body Dragged Through Street
A number of guests appearing on the Alex Jones Show following
the attack have built an indisputable case that the CIA was shipping arms from U.S.-controlled facilities
located at the U.S. mission in Benghazi to its mercenaries in Syria and the murder of ambassador Stevens was
carried out by an al-Qaeda affiliated group as part of a turf war between the CIA and elements in the
Pentagon.
The corporate media is now forced to admit that the Benghazi attack was staged
by a State Department hired jihadist security outfit in connection with an arms transfer to al-Qaeda
mercenaries in Syria.
It has yet to point out, however, that the Obama administration attempted to cover-up
the real reason for the murder of ambassador Stevens – U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and the State Department
initially pointing to a lame anti-Muslim video – and has consistently downplayed the incident and characterized
it as a non-event not requiring congressional investigation and theimpeachment of President Obama.
Rob Dew professes his contempt for the rat hole dwelling Dick Cheney, after he has bride
wrote an op-ed piece imploring American Imperialism, then Aaron Klein discusses America's;s background in
dealing with ISIS, and Alex predicts ISIS Heater Seeker Missile Threat 18 Months Ago
Alex Jones, Infowars, Nightly News, Police State, Martial Law, 9/11, Alternative Media,
Nuclear, War, putin, ww3, John Kerry, irs, cps, Hillary Clinton
ISIS is a product of U.S. government’s twisted and
decrepit foreign policy
by SCGNews | August 30, 2014
The Islamic militant group ISIS, formerly known as
Al-Qaeda in Iraq, and recently rebranded as the so called Islamic State, is the stuff of nightmares. They are
ruthless, fanatical, killers, on a mission, and that mission is to wipe out anyone and everyone, from any
religion or belief system and to impose Shari’ah law. The mass executions, beheadings and even crucifixions
that they are committing as they work towards this goal are flaunted like badges of pride, video taped and
uploaded for the whole world to see. This is the new face of evil.
Would it interest you to know who helped these
psychopaths rise to power? Would it interest you to know who armed them, funded them and trained them? Would it
interest you to know why?
This story makes more sense if we start in the middle, so we’ll begin with the overthrow of
Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.
The Libyan revolution was Obama’s first major foreign intervention. It was portrayed as an
extension of the Arab Spring, and NATO involvement was framed in humanitarian terms.
These jihadist militants from Iraq were part of what national security analysts commonly
referred to as Al-Qaeda in Iraq. Remember Al-Qaeda in Iraq was ISIS before it was rebranded.
With the assistance of U.S. and NATO intelligence and air support, the Libyan rebels captured
Gaddafi and summarily executed him in the street, all the while enthusiastically chanting “Allah Akbar”. For
many of those who had bought the official line about how these rebels were freedom fighters aiming to establish
a liberal democracy in Libya, this was the beginning of the end of their illusions.
Now after Gaddafi was overthrown, the Libyan armories were looted, and massive quantities of
weapons were sent by the Libyan rebels to Syria. The weapons, which included anti-tank and anti-aircraft
missiles were smuggled into Syria through Turkey, a NATO ally. The times of London reported on the arrival of the shipment on September 14th, 2012. (Secondary
confirmation in this NYT article) This was just three days after Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed by
the attack on the U.S. embassy in Benghazi. Chris Stevens had served as the U.S. government’s liaison to the Libyan rebels since April of 2011.
While a great deal media attention has focused on the fact that the State Department did not
provide adequate security at the consulate, and was slow to send assistance when the attack started, Pulitzer
Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh released an article in April of 2014 which exposed a classified agreement between
the CIA, Turkey and the Syrian rebels to create what was referred to as a “rat line”. The “rat line” was
covert network used to channel weapons and ammunition from Libya, through southern turkey and across the
Syrian border. Funding was provided by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
However as the rebels gained strength, the reports of war crimes and atrocities that they were committing began to create a bit of a
public relations problem for Washington. It then became standard policy to insist that U.S. support was only
being given to what they referred to as “moderate” rebel forces.
This distinction, however, had no basis in reality.
In an interview given in April of 2014, FSA commander Jamal Maarouf admitted that his fighters regularly conduct joint operations with
Al-Nusra. Al-Nusra is the official Al-Qa’ida branch in Syria. This statement is further validated
by an interview given in June of 2013 by Colonel Abdel Basset Al-Tawil, commander of the FSA’s Northern
Front. In this interview he openly discusses his ties with Al-Nusra, and expresses his desire to see Syria
ruled by sharia law. (You can verify the identities of these two commanders here in this document from The Institute for the Study of War)
Moderate rebels? Well it’s complicated.
Not that this should really come as any surprise. Reuters had reported in 2012 that the FSA’s command was dominated by Islamic
extremists, and the New York Times had reported that same year that the majority of the weapons that
Washington were sending into Syria was ending up in the hands Jihadists. For two years the U.S. government
knew that this was happening, but they kept doing it.
So to review, the FSA is working with Al-Nusra, Al-Nusra is working with ISIS, and the U.S. has
been sending money and weapons to the FSA even though they’ve known since 2012 that most of these weapons were
ending up in the hands of extremists. You do the math.
After the second sarin gas fiasco, which was also exposed and therefore failed to garner public
support for airstrikes, the U.S. continued to increase its the training and support for the rebels.
In February of 2014, Haaretz reported that the U.S. and its allies in the region, Saudi Arabia, Jordan
and Israel, were in the process of helping the Syrian rebels plan and prepare for a massive attack in the
south. According to Haaretz Israel had also provided direct assistance in military operations against Assad
four months prior (you can access a free cached version of the page here).
Then in May of 2014 PBS ran a report in which they interviewed rebels who were trained by the U.S. in
Qatar. According to those rebels they were being trained to finish off soldiers who survived attacks.
“They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut off the road,” said the fighter,
who is identified only as “Hussein.” “They also trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve
information or weapons and munitions, and how to finish off soldiers still alive after an ambush.”
This is a blatant violation of the Geneva conventions. It also runs contrary to conventional
military strategy. In conventional military strategy soldiers are better off left wounded, because this ends up
costing the enemy more resources. Executing captured enemy soldiers is the kind of tactic used when you want to
strike terror in the hearts of the enemy. It also just happens to be standard operating procedure for ISIS.
One month after this report, in June of 2014, ISIS made its dramatic entry, crossing over the
Syrian border into Iraq, capturing Mosul, Baiji and almost reaching Baghdad. The internet was suddenly flooded
with footage of drive by shootings, large scale death marches, and mass graves. And of course any Iraqi soldier
that was captured was executed.
Massive quantities of American military equipment
were seized during that operation. ISIS took entire truckloads of humvees, they took helicopters, tanks,
and artillery. They photographed and video taped themselves and advertised what they were doing on social
media, and yet for some reason Washington didn’t even TRY to stop them.
U.S. military doctrine clearly calls for the destruction of military equipment and supplies
when friendly forces cannot prevent them from falling into enemy hands, but that didn’t happen here. ISIS was
allowed to carry this equipment out of Iraq and into Syria unimpeded. The U.S. military had the means to strike
these convoys, but they didn’t lift a finger, even though they had been launching drone strikes in Pakistan
that same week.
Why would they do that?
Though Obama plays the role of a weak, indecisive, liberal president, and while pundits from
the right have had a lot of fun with that image, this is just a facade. Some presidents, like George W. Bush,
rely primarily on overt military aggression. Obama gets the same job done, but he prefers covert means. Not
really surprising considering the fact that Zbigniew Brzezinski was his mentor.
Those who know their history will remember that Zbigniew Brzezinski was directly involved in the
funding and arming the Islamic extremists in Pakistan and Afghanistan in order to weaken the
Soviets.
By the way Osama bin Laden was one of these anti-Soviet “freedom fighters” the U.S. was funding and
arming.
This operation is no secret at this point, nor are the unintended side effects.
The strategy worked. The Soviets invaded, and the ten years of war that followed are considered
by many historians as being one of the primary causes of the fall of the USSR.
This example doesn’t just establish precedent, what we’re seeing happen in Iraq, Afghanistan
and Syria right now is actually a continuation of a old story. Al-Nusra and ISIS are ideological and
organizational decedents of these extremist elements that the U.S. government made use of thirty years ago.
The U.S. the went on to create a breeding ground for these extremists by invading Iraq in 2003.
Had it not been for the vacuum of power left by the removal and execution of Saddam, Al-Qaeda in Iraq, aka
ISIS, would not exist. And had it not been for Washington’s attempt at toppling Assad by arming, funding and
training shadowy militant groups in Syria, there is no way that ISIS would have been capable of storming into
Iraq in June of 2014.
On every level, no matter how you cut it, ISIS is a product of U.S. government’s twisted and
decrepit foreign policy.
Now all of this may seem contradictory to you as you watch the drums of war against ISIS begin
to beat louder and the air strikes against them are gradually widened http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/08/president-obama-considers-possible-…). Why would
the U.S. help a terrorist organization get established, only to attack them later?
Well why did the CIA put Saddam Hussein in power in 1963?, Why did the U.S. government back Saddam in 1980
when he launched a war of aggression against Iran, even though they knew that he was using chemical weapons?
Why did the U.S. fund and arm Islamic extremists in Afghanistan against the Soviets?
There’s a pattern here if you look closely. This is a tried and true geopolitical strategy.
Step 1: Build up a dictator or extremist group which can then be used to wage proxy wars
against opponents. During this stage any crimes committed by these proxies are swept under the rug.
[Problem]
Step 2: When these nasty characters have outlived their usefulness, that’s when it’s time to
pull out all that dirt from under the rug and start publicizing it 24/7. This obviously works best when the
public has no idea how these bad guys came to power.[Reaction]
Step 3: Finally, when the public practically begging for the government to do something, a
solution is proposed. Usually the solution involves military intervention, the loss of certain liberties, or
both. [Solution]
ISIS is extremely useful. They have essentially done Washington dirty work by weakening Assad.
In 2014, while the news cycle has focused almost exclusively on Ukraine and Russia, ISIS made major headway in
Syria, and as of August they already controlled 35% of the country.
Since ISIS largely based in Syria, this gives the U.S. a pretext to move into Syria. Sooner or
later the U.S. will extend the airstrikes into Assad’s backyard, and when they do U.S. officials are already making it clear that both ISIS and the Syrian government will be
targeted. That, after all, is the whole point. Washington may allow ISIS to capture a bit more territory
first, but the writing is on the wall, and has been for some time now.
The Obama administration has repeatedly insisted that this will never lead to boots on the
ground, however, the truth of the matter is that anyone who understands anything about military tactics knows
full well that ISIS cannot be defeated by airstrikes alone. In response to airstrikes ISIS will merely disperse
and conceal their forces. ISIS isn’t an established state power which can be destroyed by knocking out key
government buildings and infrastructure. These are guerrilla fighters who cut their teeth in urban warfare.
To significantly weaken them, the war will have to involve ground troops, but even this is a lost cause. U.S. troops could certainly route ISIS in street to
street battles for some time, and they might even succeed in fully occupying Syria and Iraq for a number of
years, but eventually they will have to leave, and when they do, it should be obvious what will come
next.
The puppets that the U.S. government has installed in the various countries that they have
brought down in recent years have without exception proven to be utterly incompetent and corrupt. No one that
Washington places in power will be capable of maintaining stability in Syria. Period.
Right now, Assad is the last bastion of stability in the region. He is the last chance they
have for a moderate non-sectarian government and he is the only hope of anything even remotely resembling
democracy for the foreseeable future. If Assad falls, Islamic extremist will take the helm, they will impose
shari’ah law, and they will do everything in their power to continue spreading their ideology as far and wide
as they can.
If the world truly wants to stop ISIS, there is only one way to do it:
1. First and foremost, the U.S. government and its allies must be heavily pressured to cut all
support to the rebels who are attempting to topple Assad. Even if these rebels that the U.S. is arming and
funding were moderate, and they’re not, the fact that they are forcing Assad to fight a war on multiple fronts,
only strengthens ISIS. This is lunacy.
2. The Syrian government should be provided with financial support, equipment, training and
intelligence to enable them to turn the tide against ISIS. This is their territory, they should be the ones to
reclaim it.
Now obviously this support isn’t going to come from the U.S. or any NATO country, but there are
a number of nations who have a strategic interest in preventing another regime change and chaotic aftermath. If
these countries respond promptly, as in right now, they could preempt a U.S. intervention, and as long this
support does not include the presence of foreign troops, doing so will greatly reduce the likelihood of a major
confrontation down the road.
3. The U.S. government and its allies should should be aggressively condemned for their failed
regime change policies and the individuals behind these decisions should be charged for war crimes. This would
have to be done on an nation by nation level since the U.N. has done nothing but enable NATO aggression. While
this may not immediately result in these criminals being arrested, it would send a message. This can be done.
Malaysia has already proven this by convicting the Bush administration of war crimes in abstentia.
Now you might be thinking: “This all sounds fine and good, but what does this have to do with
me? I can’t influence this situation.”
That perspective is quite common, and for most people, it’s paralyzing, but the truth of the
matter is that we can influence this. We’ve done it before, and we can do it again.
I’ll be honest with you though, this isn’t going to be easy. To succeed we have to start
thinking strategically. Like it or not, this is a chess game. If we really want to rock the boat, we have to
start reaching out to people in positions of influence. This can mean talking to broadcasters at your local
radio station, news paper, or t.v. station, or it can mean contacting influential bloggers, celebrities,
business figures or government officials. Reaching out to current serving military and young people who may be
considering joining up is also important. But even if it’s just your neighbor, or your coworker, every single
person we can reach brings us closer to critical mass. The most important step is to start trying.
If you are confused about why this is all happening, watch this video we put out on September 11th,
2012
Ben Swann Interview with RT
US cultivated, financed ISIS
- FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds -
Published on Oct 13, 2014
President Obama admits the rise of Islamic State was never properly addressed by the
US intelligence. Vice-President of the States puts all the blame on America’s allies, saying it were they who
funded jihadists. Terrorists threaten direct attacks on American soil. Is the U.S. ready to respond with more
than just airstrikes? Was it really unaware of the growing threat? And were that the allies that gave a helping
hand to the radicalism in Iraq and Syria? To find answers to these questions, Sophie&Co speaks to FBI
whistleblower; Sibel Edmonds.
New York Times Reports U.S. Giving al-Qaeda
Millions of Dollars
Staggering amount of evidence reveals terror is U.S. and Saudi
creation
by Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | March 17, 2015
The U.S. government says it has given al-Qaeda millions
of dollars “largely because of poor oversight and loose financial controls,” reports The
New York Times.
Accodding to Fox News and the corporate
media it is merely another instance of graft and government mismanagement.
The money, supposedly part of a secret
CIA fund to pay kidnappers, was used by al-Qaeda for operational costs and weapons.
Details of the money transfers supposedly showed up in the papers of Osama bin Laden who was,
according to the official war on terror narrative, killed in 2010 in Pakistan by U.S. Navy SEALs. In fact,
according to multiples sources, the former CIA operator who headed up the Arab Afghans in the CIA’s war
against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan died in late 2001, not 2010 as the government and its corporate
media insist.
A fictional twist to the government story on the payment to al-Qaeda has Osama bin Laden
worried the money was contaminated with radiation or poison or that it would be used to track al-Qaeda
leaders and operatives.
Funding Crucial to War on Terror Operation
The recent effort to fund the enemy and thus continue unabated the highly profitable military
industrial complex and government manufactured war on terror has cost over a hundred million dollars, most
of it dispensed under the excuse of paying ransom, which the U.S. publicly denies paying.
In 2013 alone, the United States paid out $165 million. Since 2008, according to the Times, other countries added the
following amounts to the total:
France: $58.1 Million
Qatar and Oman: $20.4 Million
Switzerland: $12.4 Million
Spain: $11 Million
Austria: $3.2 Million
Undetermined Countries: $21.4 Million
Additionally, millions of dollars ends up
in al-Qaeda and Taliban coffers through contractors working in Afghanistan.
“I am deeply troubled that the US military can pursue, attack and even kill terrorists and
their supporters,” said
John Sopko, Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction, in a letter sent to Congress in 2013, “but
that some in the US government believe we cannot prevent these same people from receiving a government
contract.”
From the CIA’s massive operation in Afghanistan, funding and creating the Mujahideen that would
become al-Qaeda and the Taliban, to its work with other terrorist groups, including the drug-running Kosovo
Liberation Army, Chechnya terrorists and the Jundullah terrorists attacking Iran, there is plenty of evidence
the United States government and its partners are engaged in supporting terrorist groups for political
gain.
As
Sam Muhho notes, it is not religious sectarianism or the Wahhabist drive to execute apostates under
the banner of ISIS that is the problem, but rather it “is the hegemonic and imperialist designs of the NATO
governments who have on-record worked with Saudi Arabia and Qatar to use Islamic extremists throughout the
Middle East as their ‘Swiss army knife of destabilization’ in order to reorient the Middle East per their
interests.”
The ISIS phase of the clash of civilizations, as plotted by the neocons and the globalist think
tanks, is designed to make the war on terror a permanent feature. It not only enriches the military industrial
complex and a burgeoning national and homeland security industry, but also aimed at threatening the designs of
China and Russia in the Middle East and Africa, supporting the “imperial geostrategy,” as Zbigniew Brzezinski described it, and thus “prevent
collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to
keep the barbarians from coming together.”
Feds warn of “imminent” terror threat on U.S.
border
According to high level sources, ISIS terrorist are operating in
Ciudad Juarez on the border across from the city of El Paso, Texas.The sources state
ISIS operatives will use vehicle born improvised explosive devices in the attacks. Homeland Security, Justice
and Defense Department agents have been placed on high alert “and instructed to aggressively work all possible
leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat,” Judicial Watch reports. The attack is “coming
very soon” the high-level source warned. It is speculated an attack will happen on the anniversary of the
September 11, 2001 terror attacks.“An attack is so imminent that the commanding general
at Ft. Bliss, the U.S. Army post in El Paso, is being briefed, another source confirms. The Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to multiple inquiries from Judicial Watch, both telephonic and in
writing, about this information,” reports Judicial Watch.
AMERICAN
BORDERS
AREWIDE-OPEN!!
How could there be aWar on Terror and actually say that we're having
awar against terrorism, and leave the
borders wide open? If you were the President of the United States, or I were the President of the United
States, and9/11 really happened
the way they want us to believe it happened, the first thing you would do is shut down the borders, so people
couldn't get in the country to harm you. But they left the borders wide open. Becausethe bankers want the borders open, because they
want aone-world government.
They want a North American Union. They don't want borders
here.9/11 was only a
manifestation. It was done to create afear in the American public, so that we
willobey what they want us to
do.
It’s no longer
Al-Qaeda, it’s now supposedly your friends and neighbors. This
is the prevailing meme of every tyrannical fascist regime in history.
Attorney General Holder:
American People Are Terrorists
THE WAR ON TERROR IS AN ABSOLUTE
FRAUD
[OBAMA RELEASES MAJOR TERRORIST
ORGANIZERS OF THE TALIBAN]
Could Obama Face Impeachment For Bergdahl
release
What happened in the last few weeks to
change the Bergdahal situation? Was he a CIA operative, or was this a failed attempt to take the heat off the
VA scandal?
In 1991, the Club published The First Global
Revolution. It analyses the problems of humanity, calling these collectively or in essence the 'problematique'.
It notes (laments) that, historically, social or political unity has commonly been motivated by enemies in
common: "The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Some states have striven to overcome
domestic failure and internal contradictions by blaming external enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when
things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation
together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the
disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as
scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so
used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries
has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new
strategies imagined, and new weapons devised."
THE GLOBALISTSMOVE FROM THEIRALQAEDA
CREATION,TO FABRICATING HOMEGROWN DOMESTIC
TERROR
A failed attempt to recruit Aaron Russo resulted in
recent light being shed on the CFR...And The Fake War On
Terror!
Several
years ago, after his popular video “Mad As Hell” was released and Aaron Russo began his campaign to
become Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Nicholas Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female
attorney. Seeing Russo’s passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to
recruit Russo into the elite’s CFR. Watch the full interview here: Reflections and Warnings.
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On Terror!
Aaron Russo talks about the CFR...And The Fake War On
Terrorism!
![[ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ]](images/ALCIADUHKNIFE.jpg)
enemies. The ploy of finding a scapegoat is as old as mankind itself - when
things become too difficult at home, divert attention to adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation
together to face an outside enemy, either a real one, or else one invented for the purpose. With the
disappearance of the traditional enemy, the temptation is to use religious or ethnic minorities as
scapegoats, especially those whose differences from the majority are disturbing." "Every state has been so
used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe, that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries
has left governments and public opinion with a great void to fill. New enemies have to be identified, new
strategies imagined, and new weapons devised."
![[ AL-QAEDA EXPOSED!! ]](images/OBLHAT.jpg)
